Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. " The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities," Black, Fischer & Scholes, Myron S, 1973.Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Cambridge University Press, vol. " Valuation of pension liabilities in incomplete markets," " Empirical option pricing: a retrospection," Colin Cameron, 1992.Ĥ138, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. " Do Gasoline Prices Respond Asymmetrically to Crude Oil Price Changes?," " Valuing Oil Properties: Integrating Option Pricing and Decision Analysis Approaches," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. " Empirical Testing of Real Option-Pricing Models," " Evaluating mine plans under uncertainty: Can the real options make a difference?," " Valuing Risky Projects: Option Pricing Theory and Decision Analysis," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. " Real Options Analysis: Where Are the Emperor's Clothes?," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. " Experimental comparison of individual behavior under risk and under uncertainty for gains and for losses," Cohen, Michele & Jaffray, Jean-Yves & Said, Tanios, 1987." Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Asset Returns: A New Approach,"Įconometrica, Econometric Society, vol. Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. " Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation,"Įconometrica, Econometric Society, vol. Qt43n1k4jb, Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA. University of California at Los Angeles, Anderson Graduate School of Management " Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach," Longstaff, Francis A & Schwartz, Eduardo S, 2001." Options in the Real World: Lessons Learned in Evaluating Oil and Gas Investments," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. " The Limitations Of No-Arbitrage Arguments For Real Options," " A Forecast Comparison of Volatility Models: Does Anything Beat a GARCH(1,1)?,"Ģ001-04, Brown University, Department of Economics. Asger Lunde & Peter Reinhard Hansen, 2001.The non-standard features of our approach have a major impact: option values are large so real options based valuations substantially exceed corresponding NPV calculations. We also show that a high correlation between reservoir size at different locations creates large option values. Correctly modeling the structure of volatility has a major impact: Option values shrink by 50% if the time varying nature of volatility is ignored. Finally investment decisions can be postponed or delayed, which implies an non-European option setting, for which no analytical solutions exist. Reservoir size uncertainty is unhedgeable, which necessitates an approach dealing with incomplete markets. Gas price returns show volatility clustering, which we model using a GARCH specification. We apply the approach to exploitation decisions for a Dutch cluster of gas fields, where gas prices and field reservoir size are the two main sources of uncertainty. Contrary to real option analysis (ROA), standard NPV-based frameworks are unsuitable because they do not allow for the fact that new information may change later stage decisions. Information may arrive gradually over time and as a consequence of early stage decisions. Investment decisions in the energy industry are often undertaken sequentially and are sensitive to information on markets and geographic conditions. We apply real option theory to a highly complex energy problem with unhedgeable risk, time varying volatilities and endogenous exercise dates (non-European options). Real option theory has remained a fringe field practitioners believe it is not practically applicable in complex real world environments.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |